Can you compare “Multiple Intelligence” with ” Blooms Taxonomy”? How it is differed and similar for maximizing learning outcomes in the real-life teaching learning process?

Let’s compare Multiple Intelligence and Bloom’s Taxonomy and explore how they differ and can be used to maximize learning outcomes in the real-life teaching-learning process:

  1. Multiple Intelligence:
    • Focus: Multiple Intelligence theory, developed by Howard Gardner, suggests that individuals possess different types of intelligence, including linguistic, logical-mathematical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, intrapersonal, and naturalistic intelligences.
    • Approach: Multiple Intelligence theory emphasizes the importance of recognizing and nurturing diverse intelligences in individuals. It encourages educators to tailor teaching methods and activities to accommodate different intelligences, promoting personalized learning experiences.
    • Application: In the real-life teaching-learning process, educators can use Multiple Intelligence theory to design varied instructional strategies and learning opportunities that cater to students’ individual strengths and preferences. It promotes a more holistic approach to education by recognizing and valuing different forms of intelligence.
  1. Bloom’s Taxonomy:
    • Focus: Bloom’s Taxonomy, developed by Benjamin Bloom, is a framework that classifies cognitive learning objectives into six levels: Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating. It focuses on the cognitive processes involved in learning and development.
    • Approach: Bloom’s Taxonomy provides a hierarchical structure for categorizing learning objectives from lower-order thinking skills (e.g., remembering and understanding) to higher-order thinking skills (e.g., analyzing and creating). It guides educators in designing learning experiences that progressively challenge students’ thinking and encourage critical and creative thinking.
    • Application: In the real-life teaching-learning process, Bloom’s Taxonomy serves as a guide for designing curriculum, assessments, and instructional strategies. Educators can use it to scaffold learning experiences, starting with foundational knowledge and gradually moving towards higher-order thinking skills. It helps foster deeper understanding, problem-solving abilities, and the development of critical thinking skills.


  • Focus: Multiple Intelligence focuses on recognizing and nurturing diverse intelligence, while Bloom’s Taxonomy focuses on categorizing cognitive learning objectives.
  • Approach: Multiple Intelligence theory emphasizes personalized learning and accommodating different intelligence, while Bloom’s Taxonomy focuses on hierarchical cognitive processes and progression.
  • Application: Multiple Intelligence theory applies to diverse teaching strategies and activities, whereas Bloom’s Taxonomy is applied to curriculum design, assessments, and learning progression.


  • Learning Outcomes: Both approaches aim to maximize learning outcomes by catering to individual needs and promoting higher-order thinking skills.
  • Personalization: Both approaches acknowledge the importance of personalized learning experiences tailored to students’ strengths, preferences, and developmental levels.
  • Pedagogical Guidance: Both approaches provide educators with frameworks to guide instructional design and foster effective teaching practices.

 Educators can integrate both Multiple Intelligence theory and Bloom’s Taxonomy to create a well-rounded and inclusive learning environment. By recognizing and accommodating different intelligence, while also incorporating progressive cognitive challenges, educators can promote holistic development, engagement, and higher-level thinking in their students.